★★ Aurora SH0030 Cree XPE WC-Q5 5-Mode 114-Lumen LED Flashlight
DX - http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.26421
Note drastically lowered rating, the bodywork is better quality than the Ultrafire C3 it is based on. Pity about the drivers. See the runtimes on NiMH somewhere at the bottom of the comments. Now, the singlemode refuses to light up and the 5 mode flickers like crazy even with the bodywork removed so it's a driver issue, not an electrical continuity one.
Light Output:
Throw at 1m
14500 cell at 4.18V
High: 2810
Medium: 1390
Low: 475
The spec says it’ll work with AAs but has been revised to say 2.0-4.2V which means 14500 only unless there are some exotic cells in AA size that I’ve never heard of. The 2AA configuration with NiMH cells is too dim to be worthwhile – A Fenix E01 with a year-old alkaline cell in it beats it handsomely in this configuration.
3xEneloops at 4.36V
High: 3700
Medium: 1270
Low: 431
Lightbox:
N.B. My lightbox results are not even remotely comparable to anyoe else's so please do not use them for comparisons to anyone else's. Mine seems to be a lot more reflective internally than Jay's. But then it ought to, it got 4 coats of white gloss paint. As a rough comparison the brightest light I have (ROP High running on two D lithium cells) measures 3880 lux in this box and 25,000 lux at 1 metre. Jay's and my light meters seem to produce comparable resuolts for throw though.
14500@4.18V
High: 1005 lux
Medium: 350 lux
Low: 121 lux
With extension tube and 2 NiMH charged to 1.5V
High: 27lux A Fenix E01 with a year-old alkaline in it gives 37 lux!
Medium: 9 lux
Low: 3 lux i.e., woefully dim. !!!!!!!!!1
Current draw is only 5.11mA on medium which should give more than two weeks of 9 lux light if anyone cares. On high it draws a whole 12.2mA which should give a week of pathetic light with two Eneloops. Basically, normal NiMH cells will self-discharge faster than the light will discharge them. So let’s try yet another extension tube and see what it is like on three Eneloops (4.36V which may be pushing it). In this configuration it is 197mm long – just shy of 8 inches. Not entirely practical but some might like it that way.
Two extensions and 3 NiMH
High: 1190 lux
Medium: 417 lux
Low: 148 lux
Nice and bright but rather unwieldy.
With an Ultrafire C3 for comparison. It is ratherr better made than the Ultrafire.
Surprisingly to me, it will, just, still tailstand in this configuration.
OK, it is standing on its head there but for the ceiling beamshot it was happily tailstanding on the carpet.
The extension tubes are from Ultrafire C3s – still one of my favourite lights. This appears to be a rebadged Ultrafire C3 with a different circuit and an XPE emitter. For comparison, an Ultrafire C3 on a 14500 reads 1251 lux on the lightbox and 6100 lux at 1 metre. The stainless steel Q5 C3 reads 1305 on the lightbox on high and 5500 lux at 1 metre. None of my C3s are as green as the Aurora.
Current:
14500
High: 760mA It ought to be good for an hour on high
Medium: 230mA Around three hours
Low: 82mA Approximately forever, 9-10hr
3xNiMH
High: 980mA Two hours runtime
Medium: 295mA 6.5 hours
Low: 101mA 20ish hours
Weight
Without Battery - 43g (1.38oz)
With 14500 - 63.7g (2.39oz) (Blue Trustfire which is longer than the current grey ones.)
With extension tube and two Eneloop NiMH 107.8g
With two extension tubes and three Eneloops 146.9g
Review
See Jay’s review of the single mode here as I agree wholeheartedly with his conclusions on the general construction. He also takes better pictures than I do and externally and (mostly) internally the two lights are the same.
It is better made than the Ultrafire C3 and works better than they do with extension tubes intended for the C3. I’ve never got a C3 (I have 5) to work with more than one extension tube.
The head is a pain to get back on as the threaded portion is short and there’s a nice fat O ring in there that it can be tricky to get back in where it ought to be.
The uselessness on two AAs is unfortunate as I find it rather unwieldy on three of them. It will get used with a single 14500 anyway so this isn’t really a big deal for me. The fact that it can be used with NiMH is a bonus but I wouldn’t buy this for use with AAs. Many would mark it down for this, I don’t care.
It works fine with the longer blue Trustfires which quite a few lights won’t. The grey protected Trustfires are shorter than an Eneloop AA whereas the blue ones are 2-3mm longer.
Light Output
The beam is somewhat green but this can and will vary between samples. It is a fairly tight beam with a nice sized hot-spot. It is not a thrower, nor is it intended to be. It is tighter than I expected, probably as the reflector is fairly deep. It has a light orange-peel effect which really does clean up the beam nicely. It is much less green on a 14500 than it is on 3 NiMH cells. The Aurora is on the right, the light on the left is the Ultrafire RL-118 in all its green and ringy glory. The camera has white balanced this to death - both are greener than this pic implies, particularly the Ultrafire.
The sequence is medium, low, high strobe and SOS. It defaults to coming on in medium, but if you’ve turned it off recently it comes on in the next mode from the last-used one. Fenix do it this way, but I’d far rather it were low, medium, high or high, medium, low. This is purely a matter of personal preference.
It drives the LED at 700mA according to spec so heat should not be an issue. This means it is no brightness monster – any of my Ultrafire C3s put out more light, however it is better made than they are.
Conclusion ★★★★
Quite nice
Tailstand even with three cells
Better made than the design it is derived from
Sensible current to the LED
I have no trouble with the switch but then I don't have big hands.
Decent price
Doesn't seem to get hot even on high with a 14500
Could use a longer thread on the head end of the body
I personally dislike the medium, low, high arrangement
Not the brightest thing out there
Prefer my Ultrafire C3s
Runtime when I get around to doing some wiring and soldering and outdoor beamshots when it is not cold, wet and windy like it is again tonight.
It has, briefly, stopped raining so here are some beamshots. Still messing with settings, the other outdoor shots were taken at ISO 100 but i thought 200 would be better for the smaller lights. As a result these shots seem much brighter than the ones done for the other lights which were done at ISO100. All exposures were 4 seconds.
Control. As you can see we have quite a lot of light pollution accentuated by the very low clouds. It started raining again as I took these. The bright blob on the right is someone's security light that stays on because of the high winds.
Low: As you can see my aim was somewhat off - I was aiming at the tree which is 15.5m away. The pole on the right is about 3m away.
Medium: It is very windy, or at least that's my excuse. The camera was on a tripod but it looks like the wind made it wobble - will need to look into hanging some great weight off it for stability.

High: My aim is better this time. It helps when you can see what you are doing.

The beam is quite wide - the pole on the right is about 3m away and the spill has lit it up quite nicely. This is not a dedicated thrower. If the wind and rain die down a bit I'll try some more shots for comparison purposes.
Don
- 2009.11.23
- 09:48:27
- (*.143.128.181)
Problem with the backyard is keeping it usable. 100+ metres of hedge takes a lot of trimming... Not to mention how long it takes to keep the grass cut. Or how to dispose of the cuttings. A gardener I am not. Nor do I wish to be.
When I moved in 20 years ago the 60 year old hedges took serious effort to prune as were 3m thick. Took a lot of work to cut them back - in 1936 when this place was built everyone planted hedges. Got a bit out of control since then,
My great grandmother bought this place new for the sort of money I'd now spend on a really good light. It is now worth 700x as much as my great grandmother paid for it. I earn more in a week (after deductions) than it cost in 1936. This is scary. Property values have gone mad here - this place would now cost nearly two decades of my gross income. Was 5 years when I moved in.
Living alone (but for the hound) has its advantages. No need to wait till others are asleep. Pity about the weather. The backyard needs quite a lot of work to keep usable, especially when the dog needs cleaning up behind. She is wonderful, but does output rather a a lot.<a href="http://s83.photobucket.com/albums/j282/dulridge/?action=view¤t=Fizzy.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j282/dulridge/Fizzy.jpg" border="0" alt="Fizz"></a>
I have shamelessly copied your review format to try to get some sort of consistency - it is important to try to make reviews comparable with one another. My lightbox doesn't remotely compare to yours though I did think about fiddling it till my numbers looked like yours. If my reviews look good it is because of your efforts. The format is yours. I plan to do more soon if the weather permits. I'll need to retake most of the pictures though. It looks like a higher ISO setting will work better.
Darkness is easy here at this time of year - I go to work in the dark and come home in the dark. There is still light in the mornings, but not for much longer. While light pollution is a problem, i can get to totally dark skies in less than an hour's driving. I have the use of a place 53 miles west of here where the nearest streetlight is 30 miles away. I used to commuter from there but the drive in winter on a motorcycle got too cold for me.
Plan to do better with the reviews in the future, still sorting out settings and the like. And you do way better pictures than I do. Most of my photo gear is over 30 years old - I own a Leica III which is older than my father and use it. But scanning film is a huge pain. And it takes forever plus a week to remove the dust that sneaks in. Took me 3 years to sort out my brother's wedding pictures. I have access to q drum scanner that cost more than my house. However, sticking the negatives in it and scanning stuff properly takes approximately forever. Must get a better digital camera.
I have my resons for preferring here to CPF which is getting terribly snotty about affordable lights. This place suite me better.
jayki
- 2009.11.23
- 11:46:54
- (*.185.55.9)
Yeah. My wedding photos were taken with Provia slide films also. Have about 5 rolls worth and I've scanned only about 10 slides.
I also got super annoyed with dust and hence gone digital SLR as soon as it came out. (Bought the very first Canon DSLR which was D30)
Now I've gone through quite a few DSLRs since then but stopped after going to 20D.
CPF was where it all started for me. Started posting 'comments' of what I bought which then ended up being so popular that it became a sticky.
Then it really took off. I think my thread (all parts combined) had more hits than any other thread in CPF history. Not a bad feat I though.
But it became very weird when the moderators decided to just attach ANY non-premium-branded light-related posts into the end of my thread.
Also, deleting most online shop links as it's deemed advertising didn't go well with me either.
To me, sharing shop links where it's in stock, is cheap and is selling that particular light, is genuinely helpful information. Oh well.
Hence I created my own site here (I'm terrible at web design...) so that I can post whatever I want and however I want it.
I hope that it's a more free'er place for others to post also without worrying about posting stuff on these budget lights. =)
Don
- 2010.02.05
- 17:36:01
- (*.157.20.81)
I think this needs a fairly drastic downgrading of its mark - stuck it on the lightbox with 3AAs last night. Light output is all over the place. I can double the light output by tapping the light (not a mode change). At the current output it may just run longer than the battery in the meter. The single mode was the same and now refuses to light up at all even after all the usual C3 tricks - new driver time for both I think. Will put up graphs once the Eneloops finally give up.
Rating modification as in do not buy
Don
- 2010.02.06
- 04:50:45
- (*.157.20.81)
Now look at the multimode with 3 NiMH on medium. Regulation? What regulation? At the charge taken out of the cells, it should have been good for at least another 36 hours but for much of the time the output was so low, the solar cell registered no current. It was quite comfortable to look into the lit LED at that level. A sharp smack against the desk and the output would go up again. Time to gut it and fix the bad driver.




Don, that's one great review. I thank you for posting your quality reviews up here.
I also appreciate you using the same star rating to make them more consistent looking. =)
Wish I had a house with a backyard. Living in a small unit just isn't helpful really.
(Can't find a dark place in the house until everyone's asleep but then I sleep early also.. =P)